A hand drawn computer with browser's interface and open modal in it, in soft pastel colors.

It is time to update the Dialog

Published in web

The HTML dialog element has been around for quite a while, but only recently got a decent browser support , thanks to IE11 death and Safari updates. For those who need wider support range, Chrome team has a tiny polyfill available .

Let’s look at the examples of an accessible Dialog component first to see what parts we need to “get inspired by”.

Radix example :

import * as Dialog from "@radix-ui/react-dialog";
export default () => {
const [open, setOpen] = React.useState(false);
return (
<Dialog.Root open={open} onOpenChange={setOpen}>
<Dialog.Trigger>Open</Dialog.Trigger>
<Dialog.Portal>
<Dialog.Overlay />
<Dialog.Content>
<form
onSubmit={(event) => {
performOperation().then(() => setOpen(false));
event.preventDefault();
}}
>
{/** some inputs */}
<button type="submit">Submit</button>
</form>
</Dialog.Content>
</Dialog.Portal>
</Dialog.Root>
);
};

You noticed I pulled in “Controlled” example with open state provided by the consumer. I believe that in most cases the consumers of the dialog will be controlling when and how the dialog is closed.

Similarly, React Spectrum by Adobe example:

import {
ActionButton,
Button,
ButtonGroup,
Content,
Dialog,
DialogTrigger,
Divider,
Header,
Heading,
Text,
} from "@adobe/react-spectrum";
<DialogTrigger>
<ActionButton>Check connectivity</ActionButton>
{(close) => (
<Dialog>
<Heading>Internet Speed Test</Heading>
<Header>Connection status: Connected</Header>
<Divider />
<Content>
<Text>Start speed test?</Text>
</Content>
<ButtonGroup>
<Button variant="secondary" onPress={close}>
Cancel
</Button>
<Button variant="accent" onPress={close}>
Confirm
</Button>
</ButtonGroup>
</Dialog>
)}
</DialogTrigger>;

Here, the API is a little different. React Spectrum always pass close callback for the consumer of the component to control the internal open state of the Dialog .

Enter native dialog #

Approaching the API naïvely, we could do something like this:

const Dialog = ({ open, children, ...props }) => {
return (
<dialog open={open} {...props}>
{children}
</dialog>
);
};
const App = () => {
const [open, setOpen] = useState(false);
return (
<>
<button type="button" onClick={() => setOpen(true)}>
Open dialog
</button>
<Dialog open={open}>
<form
onSubmit={(e) => {
perform().then(() => setOpen(false));
e.preventDefault();
}}
>
...
<button>OK</button>
</form>
</Dialog>
</>
);
};

By providing open attribute to the <dialog> , however, you are opting out from all the accessibility benefits <dialog> can provide. No surprise, as MDN’s description of the property is:

The open property of the HTMLDialogElement interface is a boolean value reflecting the open HTML attribute, indicating whether the <dialog> is available for interaction. The property is now read only — it is possible to set the value to programmatically show or hide the dialog.

React sets open attribute as the value changes, making the dialog available for interaction. But that’s not really want we want. Let’s take another approach instead:

const Dialog = ({ open, hide, children, ...props }) => {
const dialogRef = useRef(null);
useEffect(() => {
if (open) {
dialogRef.current.showModal();
} else {
dialogRef.current.close();
}
}, [open]);
return (
<dialog
ref={dialogRef}
// hide is a `() => void` function that sets `open` state to `false`
onClose={hide}
onCancel={hide}
{...props}
>
{children}
</dialog>
);
};

This is more verbose, but with this simple change, your <dialog> already handles all the accessibility requirements of the dialog window:

  • captures focus within the dialog, making other page content “invisible”;
  • applies backdrop, clicking on which will close the dialog;
  • Esc press will close the dialog;
  • focus returns to the trigger element after the dialog is closed;

Give better controls #

In the simple implementation above, you could see that the Dialog now requires passing hide method. This can also be used to provide a consistent close button across all of your application:

<dialog {...props}>
<button type="button" aria-label="Close the dialog">
X
</button>
...
</dialog>

The way you can leverage the fact that your consumers need to control the state of the dialog, is by providing a re-usable function of the controls state, to pass down to your Dialog component:

// Creates controls
export function useDialogControls({ defaultOpen }) {
const [open, setOpen] = useState(defaultOpen);
return {
open,
show: () => setOpen(true),
hide: () => setOpen(false),
toggle: () => setOpen((open) => !open),
};
}
// Uses controls
export const Dialog = ({ controls, children, ...props }) => {
const dialogRef = useRef(null);
useEffect(() => {
if (controls.open) {
dialogRef.current?.showModal();
} else {
dialogRef.current?.close();
}
}, [controls.open]);
return (
<dialog
ref={dialogRef}
onClose={controls.hide}
onCancel={controls.hide}
{...props}
>
{children}
</dialog>
);
};

Now the consumers of the Dialog can simply use useDialogControls and pass the controls down to the Dialog :

const App = () => {
const controls = useDialogControls({ defaultOpen: false });
return (
<>
<button type="button" onClick={controls.show}>
Open dialog
</button>
<Dialog controls={controls}>
...
<button type="button" onClick={controls.hide}>
OK
</button>
</Dialog>
</>
);
};

This approach is used by the upcoming Ariakit - Dialog and I love it: it’s DRY, concise and extensible (Ariakit version is also more optimised for passing controls around without causing rerenders).

const App = () => {
const dialog = useDialogState();
return (
<>
<Button onClick={dialog.toggle}>Show modal</Button>
<Dialog state={dialog} className="dialog">
<DialogDismiss>OK</DialogDismiss>
</Dialog>
</>
);
};

useEffect is ugly there #

…can’t we just call

{
hide: () => dialogRef.current.close(),
show: () => dialogRef.current.showModal()
}

?

Well, you could, by reversing the control:

export function useDialogControls({ defaultOpen }) {
const dialogRef = useRef(null);
const [open, setOpen] = useState(defaultOpen);
return {
dialogRef,
open,
show: () => {
setOpen(true);
dialogRef.current?.showModal();
},
hide: () => {
setOpen(false);
dialogRef.current?.close();
},
toggle: () => {
if (dialogRef.current?.open) {
dialogRef.current?.close();
setOpen(false);
} else {
dialogRef.current?.showModal();
setOpen(true);
}
},
};
}

And then use it as before:

const Dialog = ({ controls, children, ...props }) => {
return (
<dialog
ref={controls.dialogRef}
onClose={controls.hide}
onCancel={controls.hide}
{...props}
>
{children}
</dialog>
);
};
const App = () => {
const controls = useDialogControls({ defaultOpen: false });
return (
<>
<button type="button" onClick={controls.show}>
Open dialog
</button>
<Dialog controls={controls}>
{controls.Open ? <FormWithFetchForLatestData /> : null}
</Dialog>
</>
);
};

This might seem a bit more of an “inside out” approach, exposing dialogRef onto the consumer of the dialog, but in the end, does it really matter?

Is that it? #

Technically yes, but also not. There’s a reason why RadixUI and React Spectrum wrap the Dialog into ContextProvider and provide trigger Button primitive. This allows connecting a trigger button to its dialog for screen readers at any depth. All of them also provide a way to specify the description of the dialog for screen readers, like so:

<Dialog controls={controls}>
<Heading>Create new avatar</Heading>
</Dialog>

As both elements can read from parent’s context, <dialog> can be connected to the Heading text via aria-labelledby and id to improve the accessibility:

// output:
<dialog aria-labelledby="generated-unique-id">
<h2 id="generated-unique-id">Create new avatar</h2>
</dialog>

Which you can also expect consumer to care about instead:

const App = () => {
const controls = useDialogControls({ defaultOpen: false });
const heading = 'Create new avatar';
return (
<>
<button type="button" onClick={controls.show}>
Open dialog
</button>
<Dialog controls={controls} aria-label={heading}>
<h1>{heading}</h2>
</Dialog>
</>
);
};

I always suggest to go to the libraries I mentioned and run their examples with screen readers, like Voice Over on Mac, to see how richer the experience becomes with proper accessibility hints. Luckily, all the libraries I mentioned are open-sourced and can be served as a great inspiration for your own component API.